At a glance
AMP
An easier path to great Page Experience for everyone. Powered by AMP.
ezCache
Lightning-fast WordPress optimization — page caching, Redis Object Cache, Critical CSS, WebP images, CSS/JS optimization, and 15+ performance tools.
Full Comparison
Technical Specs
| Metric | AMP | ezCache |
|---|---|---|
| Requires WP | 6.5+ | 5.0+ |
| Requires PHP | 7.4+ | 7.4+ |
| Tested up to WP | 6.8.5 | 6.8.5 |
| Plugin age | 11 yrs | 7 yrs |
Quick Verdict
ezCache is the better choice for most WordPress sites. AMP has 40x more installs, but ezCache earns an 80% five-star rating with zero one-star reviews. For speed optimization, caching, and modern performance tools, ezCache delivers a complete package. AMP serves a narrow niche for mobile-accelerated pages. Your site likely needs what ezCache offers.
Feature Comparison: AMP vs ezCache
| Feature | AMP | ezCache |
|---|---|---|
| Page caching | No | Yes |
| Redis Object Cache | No | Yes |
| Critical CSS generation | No | Yes |
| WebP image delivery | No | Yes |
| CSS/JS minification | No | Yes |
| Mobile-optimized page framework | Yes | No |
| Page Experience scoring | Yes | Indirect (via speed tools) |
| Total performance tools included | 1 (AMP framework) | 15+ |
Who Should Use AMP
- Teams focused on Google Page Experience metrics who want a dedicated framework built for that goal.
- Sites serving content-heavy pages where instant loading on mobile is the primary objective, trusted by 400K+ installs.
- Developers who need strict AMP validation for news, ads, or email campaigns.
Who Should Use ezCache
- Site owners who want one plugin to handle page caching, Redis Object Cache, Critical CSS, and WebP images, 15+ tools in one install.
- Anyone who values a plugin with an 80% five-star rating and zero one-star reviews from its user base.
- WordPress users who want to enable page caching in WordPress without juggling multiple plugins.
Community & Support
AMP has 61% of its 367 reviews at five stars, but 21% at one star. That split suggests mixed experiences. ezCache shows 80% five-star ratings and 0% one-star, indicating consistent satisfaction. The support sample for both plugins is too small to draw conclusions about thread resolution.
Verdict: AMP or ezCache for WordPress sites?
Pick AMP if your site must serve AMP-valid pages for Google News, ads, or email. It remains the best AMP plugin for WordPress for that specific use case. The framework improves mobile speed, but it does nothing for caching or image optimization.
Pick ezCache if you want a complete performance solution. It offers page caching, Redis Object Cache, Critical CSS, and WebP images in one package. With an 80% five-star rating and zero one-star reviews, ezCache wins on real-world user satisfaction. For most WordPress sites, ezCache is the smarter choice.
This comparison is AI-generated from live WordPress.org data. Install counts, ratings, versions and support statistics sync weekly, so the numbers on this page stay current. Content passes automated quality checks before publishing, and pages below our quality threshold are held for human review.
Read our full methodologyFrequently Asked Questions
Q How many people use AMP compared to ezCache?
AMP has 400K+ active installs while ezCache has 10K+, meaning AMP is used on more sites.
Q Which has better user ratings — AMP or ezCache?
ezCache averages 4.6/5 from 5 reviews, while AMP averages 3.8/5 from 367 reviews — ezCache has the higher average rating.
Q Which is more actively maintained — AMP or ezCache?
ezCache was last updated on Jun 29, 2026 and AMP on Apr 10, 2025, so ezCache received the more recent update.
Q Are AMP and ezCache both free?
Yes — both AMP and ezCache are free to install from the official WordPress.org plugin directory. Some features may require a paid upgrade offered by the plugin author.
Q Is AMP or ezCache better for WordPress sites?
AMP is better if your main goal is to improve mobile page experience and pass Core Web Vitals on articles, as it strips down your pages to load instantly. ezCache is better for general site speed on all pages without changing how your site looks, making it the stronger choice for most standard WordPress sites.
Q Which is easier to set up for a WordPress beginner — AMP or ezCache?
ezCache is much easier for a beginner because you can activate it and your site speeds up immediately with no design changes. AMP requires you to handle a separate mobile version of your site and often needs theme adjustments, which can confuse new users.
Q What is the biggest feature difference between AMP and ezCache?
AMP forces your pages into a stripped-down, lightweight format specifically for mobile speed and Google page experience, which can break custom layouts. ezCache focuses on caching your existing pages and database queries to speed up every page without altering your design or content.
Q Can you switch from AMP to ezCache (or the other way) without losing data?
Yes, you can switch without losing your content because both plugins work on top of your existing posts and pages. Your text, images, and settings in WordPress remain untouched, though you will need to clear any cached files when moving from ezCache to AMP.
Q Which type of site should choose AMP, and which should choose ezCache?
Choose AMP if you run a news site or blog with mostly text articles where instant mobile loading is critical for ad revenue and search rankings. Choose ezCache for any ecommerce store, membership site, or business website where you need fast load times on every page without sacrificing your custom design or interactive features.
More Performance & Caching Comparisons
OMGF vs Jetpack Boost
Breeze Cache vs OMGF
Imagify vs Converter for Media
WP-Optimize vs CLP Varnish Cache
WP Fastest Cache vs SpeedyCache
Smush vs Imagify
WP-Optimize vs Breeze Cache
Imagify vs ShortPixel Image Optimizer